Discours critiques pour l’étude de la littérature autochtone dans l’espace francophone du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’interesse aux reflexions theoriques et analytiques pouvant servir a l’etude de la litterature autochtone dans l’espace francophone du Quebec. Il dresse d’abord un etat des lieux de la litterature autochtone de langue francaise, puis fait valoir que les travaux realises dans l’espace anglophone en Amerique du Nord peuvent non seulement enrichir les reflexions qui prennent forme autour de la litterature autochtone de langue francaise au Quebec, mais egalement soutenir la legitimation de cette derniere dans les universites francophones. L’article degage quelques pistes de recherche a partir de discours critiques elaborees par les etudes litteraires autochtones dans l’espace anglophone (par exemple, sur l’epistemologie de la recherche et l’oralite a l’œuvre dans l’ecriture litteraire et theâtrale), puis montre en quoi les discours critiques et les œuvres litteraires et theâtrales des createurs autochtones dont les œuvres sont diffusees dans l’espace francophone participent de cette reflexion. La conclusion attire l’attention sur les questions que pose le contexte particulier du Quebec en ce qui a trait a la litterature et aux etudes litteraires autochtones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".