MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1519870808 · doi:10.1002/9781118705308.ch9

Multidrug Resistance Protein

2014· other· en· W1519870808 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Clay, Frances J. Sharom

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple drug resistanceP-glycoproteinPharmacokineticsATP-binding cassette transporterFlippaseDrug resistanceLiposomeLipid bilayerCellVesicleDrugPharmacologyChemistryBiologyCell biologyCancer researchTransporterBiochemistryMembraneGeneGeneticsPhospholipid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overexpression of P-Glycoprotein (Pgp) was linked to multidrug resistance (MDR) in mammalian cell lines and human cancers, evoking intense interest first from molecular and cell biologists and later, when purified Pgp became available, from biochemists and biophysicists. The transport activity of Pgp has been studied in both intact cells and simpler subcellular systems, such as plasma membrane vesicles and reconstituted proteoliposomes. The vacuum cleaner and flippase models propose that drugs and modulators gain access to the Pgp binding pocket through the lipid bilayer. Pgp plays a central role in the absorption and distribution of many drugs used to treat human diseases and is an important determinant of their pharmacokinetic profile and, ultimately, the clinical response. Many human cancers become simultaneously resistant to several different anticancer drugs, leading to failure of chemotherapy treatment. Pgp polymorphisms can alter the pharmacokinetics of its substrates and thus influence the clinical outcome of drug treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→