Lecturers’ Perception of Constraints Facing the Teaching of Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges of Education in South South Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study investigated the constraints facing the teaching of entrepreneurship education in colleges of education inSouth South Nigeria. A research question was raised and three hypotheses were formulated for the study. Adescriptive survey design was used for the study. The population which also served as sample comprised 206Business Education lecturers. The researcher used a questionnaire which has 24 items. The content and face of theinstrument was validated by experts in business education and measurement and evaluation. The questionnaire has areliability value of 0.92 using Cronbach alpha. Mean score and standard deviation were used to answer the researchquestion while t-test was used to test the hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. The findings are ineffectivemonitoring, ineffective evaluation, insufficient time, poor welfare package and inadequate teaching facilities aresome of the constraints facing the teaching of entrepreneurship education in colleges of education. It was, therefore,recommended that adequate teaching facilities should be provided by the school authorities to enhance qualityteaching of entrepreneurship education. Adequate teachers should also be employed by school authorities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".