MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase 1 study of the selective cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor P276–00 in patients with advanced refractory neoplasms

2007· article· en· W1519992109 on OpenAlexaff
Hal W. Hirte, Tara Baetz, Sebastién J. Hotte, S. Rajappa, A. Iacobucci, Shringi Sharma, Himanshu Parikh, S Kulkarni, Santosh Patil, Sandra M. Gaston

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortPharmacokineticsCyclin-dependent kinaseRefractory (planetary science)PharmacologyInternal medicineToxicityPharmacodynamicsCyclin D1CDK inhibitorOncologyCancerGastroenterologyCell cycleBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

14117 Background: In human cancers, genetic and epigenetic events result in over-expression of cyclins or absence or diminished levels of Cdk inhibitors, providing tumor cells with selective growth advantage. This has prompted the development of pharmacological Cdk inhibitors that could potentially produce anti-tumor effect. P276–00 is a selective Cdk4-D1 and Cdk1-B inhibitor. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumour activity of P276–00 given intravenously to patients with advanced refractory solid tumours. Methods: P276–00 was administered in escalating doses to cohorts of eligible patients (pts), starting with a dose of 9 mg/m2 as a 30 minute iv infusion day 1 to 5, and day 8 to 12, q 3 weekly. To date 22 pts have been entered on the study (cohort 1 - 4 pts at 9 mg/m2, cohort 2 - 4 pts at 12.6 mg/m2, cohort 3 - 6 pts at 17.6 mg/m2, cohort 4 - 8 pts at 24.6 mg/m2) with PS 0–2, and mean age of 56 years. Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on cycle 1 days 1 and 5. Skin biopsies were obtained immediately prior to starting study treatment and on day 21 of cycle 2 and will be analyzed for Ki67, cleaved caspase 3, phospho-Rb, cyclin D1 and cdk4, and microarray. Results: To date dose limiting toxicity has occurred in one pt. Grade 3 fatigue occurred in 1 pt at 17.6 mg/m2. The most common drug-related adverse events, which were all grade 1 or 2, were fatigue, nausea, hypotension, sweating, and dry mouth. No Grade 3 biochemical toxicities have been reported so far. There have been no responses noted to date. 4 pts have stable disease after 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic results: The Cmax, t1/2, and AUC0–8 on day 1 were as follows: 9 mg/m2- 315 ng/mL, 6.6 hr, 883 ng.h/mL; 12.6 mg/m2- 402 ng/mL, 5.5 hr, 848 ng.h/mL; 17.6 mg/m2- 589 ng/mL, 5.3 hr, 1289 ng.h/mL; 24.6 mg/m2- 621 ng/mL, 5.6 hr, 1286 ng.h/mL. Conclusions: P276–00 is well tolerated, but grade 3 fatigue has been noted in 1 pt at 17.6 mg/m2 dose level. We have observed confirmed stable disease in one patient. PK results indicate that at 9 mg/m2,12.6 mg/m2, 17.6 mg/m2 and 24.6 mg/m2 we are able to cross the cdk4 enzyme IC50 approximately 10, 13, 19 and 20 times and cross the anti-proliferative IC50 1.1, 1.4, 2.1 and 2.2 times respectively. Accrual continues at the 34.4 mg/m2 dose level. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207