Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Sixth EU-Latin America and Caribbean Summit (Madrid, 18 May 2010) acknowledged the incomplete realization of the ambitious project launched in 1999 in Rio (Brazil) whose goal was to create a ‘Bi-regional Strategic Partnership’. In fact, despite long bilateral and multilateral negotiations, the Eu/Mercosur Association Agreement has not been signed yet. Such an agreement, aiming at creating a broad market of near 750 million people, would have been a significant improvement in the relations between the two regions. Meanwhile, specific agreements are being reached (Eu/Central America, Eu/Peru, Eu/Colombia), adding up to the already existing ones (Eu/Mexico, Eu/Chile). New sectors of cooperation are appearing (investments, infrastructures, energy, Smes, cultural heritage, environment, climate change, fight on terrorism, drugs and trans-national organized crime): knowledge as a whole becomes relevant (science, research, innovation and technology). A Eu-Latin America Foundation will be created. In the meantime, a new Oas excluding the US and Canada is emerging through the creation of a Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (Calc), adding itself to the existing Unasur and Alba. A new model of regional integration is emerging in L.A. different from the European one. Le sixieme sommet Union Europeenne/Amerique Latine et Caraibes, reuni a Madrid le 18 mai 2010, a pris acte de la realisation seulement partielle de l’ambitieux projet lance a Rio en 1999 visant a faire naitre un ‘partenariat strategique biregional’. En effet, malgre de longues negociations bilaterales et multilaterales (dans le cadre du Doha Round notamment), la conclusion de l’accord d’association Ue/Mercosur n’a toujours pas vu le jour. Un tel accord, visant a creer un vaste marche de pres de 750 millions de personnes, aurait constitue un veritable saut qualitatif dans les rapports entre les deux regions. Se dessinent en revanche des accords specifiques (Ue/Amerique centrale, Ue/Perou, Ue/Colombie), qui s’ajoutent a ceux deja existants (Ue/Mexique, Ue/Chili). En meme temps se multiplient les secteurs de cooperation (investissements, infrastructures, energie, PME, patrimoine culturel, environnement, changement climatique, lutte contre la drogue et la criminalite organisee): une attention particuliere est consacree a l’economie de la connaissance (science, recherche, innovation, technologique). Une Fondation Ue/Amerique Latine devrait egalement voir le jour. Entre temps se profile en Amerique latine une nouvelle Oea excluant Etats-Unis et Canada, a travers la creation d’une Communaute des Etats d’Amerique Latine et des Caraibes (Calc), qui s’ajouterait a l’Unasur et a l’Alba. Une nouvelle forme d’integration differente du modele europeen se dessine en A.L.. PAROLE CHIAVE: Associazione strategica biregionale; Sesto vertice Ue-Alc; Investimenti europei in America Latina; Spazio Ue-Alc della conoscenza; Nuove forme di integrazione.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".