‘It is life threatening but I don't mind’. A qualitative study using photo elicitation interviews to explore adolescents' experiences of renal replacement therapies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) transforms the life prospects of young people with established renal failure. However, these treatments can have significant physiological and psychological implications for adolescents as they prepare to transition into adulthood. Health policies increasingly emphasize children and youth's active participation and consultation as users of health services, yet studies infrequently seek their experiences directly. METHODS: Adolescents receiving RRT in a large UK teaching hospital took photographs illustrating the impact of their condition and treatment on their lives. Qualitative photo elicitation interviews were conducted to explore the significance of the images and the young person's experiences. Interviews were analysed using descriptive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Ten young people aged 13-17 years participated. Themes identified were: (1) understanding and acceptance of treatment; (2) living in a non-functioning body; (3) impact upon daily life; (4) sources of support. Young people found treatments challenging and experienced significant impact on relationships and daily routines. Yet, health was prioritized over body image and participants demonstrated great emotional resilience. Young people valued support from family and friends, although were wary of disclosing their condition in case it resulted in being highlighted as different. Young people reported hospital staff as being caring and professional, but their biggest virtue appeared to be their willingness to treat the young people as 'normal'. CONCLUSIONS: Young people engaged readily with the research, and frankly described the impact of RRT on their everyday lives. Service providers must ensure that adolescents' developmental needs are met as traditional tasks of adolescence may lose priority. However, it is also clear that young people's ability to cope with treatments should not be underestimated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it