MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520386933

Isolation of a novel iris-specific and leucine-rich repeat protein (oculoglycan) using differential selection.

2000· article· en· W1520386933 on OpenAlexaff
James S. Friedman, Ron Ducharme, Vincent Raymond, Michael A. Walter

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyComplementary DNAcDNA libraryGeneticsMolecular biologyNorthern blotGeneCandidate geneHomology (biology)Differential display
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To identify and characterize genes expressed in the iris. METHODS: A human adult iris cDNA library was constructed and subjected to a differential selection screen to identify genes preferentially expressed in iris or trabecular tissue versus those expressed in lymphoblasts. Selected cDNAs were partially sequenced. Novel cDNAs were chosen for further analysis. The cDNAs were localized within chromosomes using a radiation hybrid (RH) mapping panel. The tissue expression profile of each cDNA was found through computer-based searches. One novel cDNA was subjected to 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends and Northern blot analysis. RESULTS: Of 24 differentially selected clones, 14 cDNAs had homology to known genes, whereas the other 10 were previously uncharacterized cDNA clones. IR185 was one novel iris cDNA identified. Northern blot analysis with IR185 indicated that it is expressed in human fetal liver as a 2.7-kb transcript and in adult iris as a 1.6-kb transcript. Computer-based searches of public databases and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments have determined that IR185 is also expressed in retina. RH mapping experiments have localized IR185 to the chromosomal interval 1q31-q32, near the loci for age-related degeneration (1q25-q31) and retinitis pigmentosa 12 (1q31-q32), and IR185 is in the region for posterior column ataxia with retinitis pigmentosa (1q31-q32). It has a 996-bp open reading frame encoding a putative protein with homology to the small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) family. The IR185 gene has been tentatively named oculoglycan. CONCLUSIONS: Differential selection is a technique that has been useful in identifying genes specific to a variety of tissues. This is the first time this technique has been applied to the iris. Characterizing genes highly or uniquely expressed in the iris can assist in clarifying our understanding of iris function and lead to a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of ocular disease. IR185 is a tentative candidate for one eye disorder genetically localized to chromosome 1q31-q32.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207