MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1520773191

S-nitrosoglutathione photolysis as a novel therapy for antifibrosis in filtration surgery.

2000· article· en· W1520773191 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Tannous, Cindy Hutnik, David P. Tingey, Bülent Mutus

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPhotosensitizerFibroblastPhotodynamic therapyCell cultureFluorescenceS-NitrosoglutathioneBiophysicsBiochemistryIn vitroGlutathioneBiologyPhotochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine whether a novel peroxynitrite-based photosensitizer S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) can produce specific in vitro light-induced cell death of both standard animal lung and human Tenon's capsule (TC) fibroblasts and to compare this effect with that produced by the established photodynamic porphyrin precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA). METHODS: V79-4 Chinese hamster lung and human TC fibroblasts were established in tissue culture. GSNO, together with its radioactive tritiated and fluorescent dansylated derivatives, were synthesized. The labeled molecules were prepared to determine the time course of uptake into the fibroblasts. Uptake was monitored by scintillation counting for the tritiated GSNO and confocal fluorescence microscopy for the dansylated GSNO. The uptake of ALA and biosynthesis of its photosensitive product were determined by fluorescence emission spectroscopy of a separate set of fibroblasts. Once uptake was established, both cell lines were incubated with varying concentrations of GSNO or ALA as a function of time (0, 4, or 24 hours) before light exposure (200 msec pulsed visible light, 0.068 W per pulse, for 10 minutes at a distance of 10 cm). After 10 minutes of irradiation, the cells were washed and exposed to fresh tissue culture medium. The effect of the treatment was determined 24 hours later by measuring cell viability. RESULTS: A 2-minute drug treatment time (0 hours incubation) with GSNO, followed by 10 minutes of irradiation, resulted in approximately 78% of fibroblast cell death at the lowest concentration of GSNO used compared with the control, which was exposed to light, but no GSNO. The higher concentrations of GSNO, or longer drug treatment times before irradiation, did not statistically increase cell death. Maximal cell death was thus obtained using the lowest GSNO concentration (50 mM) and drug treatment time (2 minutes). In contrast, the well-established photosensitizer ALA killed only approximately 4% of cells at the lowest concentration and drug treatment time tested. At drug treatment times of 4 hours and less, increased concentrations of ALA did not produce cell death of more statistical significance. It was not until 24 hours of drug treatment that comparable amounts of cell death were produced by ALA and GSNO. In all experiments similar results were obtained with the animal lung and human TC fibroblasts, suggesting that the source of the fibroblast had no effect on the outcome. The differences in treatment effects between GSNO and ALA were statistically significant under all conditions tested. CONCLUSIONS: GSNO is able to cause light-specific cell death of human TC fibroblasts at drug treatment times (2 minutes) and irradiation times (10 minutes) that would be compatible with its use in glaucoma filtering surgery. This in vitro performance was superior to that of the well-established photosensitizer ALA, which required treatment times longer than 4 hours to approach the light-specific cell death produced by only 2 minutes of GSNO treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207