Diverse sensory inputs permit priming in the acidic saline model of hyperalgesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rodent acidic saline model of hyperalgesia uses repeat injections of acidic saline in the right lateral gastrocnemius muscle, spaced five days apart, to induce a persistent decrease in hindpaw withdrawal thresholds. The objective of this study was to determine if alternate injection sites would permit development of hyperalgesia. METHODS: The location of the first muscle injection was varied between 3 groups of rats to include the right lateral gastrocnemius, the right medial gastrocnemius or the left lateral gastrocnemius. All second injections were placed in the right lateral gastrocnemius. RESULTS: As reported by others, placing both injections in the right lateral gastrocnemius produced a significant reduction in paw withdrawal thresholds 24 hours after the second injection (p < 0.05). Relocating the first injection to the right medial gastrocnemius or the left lateral gastrocnemius also produced significant reductions in paw withdrawal thresholds (p < 0.05 for both). Hyperalgesia was also observed if the first muscle injection was replaced with a systemic injection of lipopolysaccharide. Further experiments tested whether glia cells may contribute to the priming process. Pretreatment with minocycline prior to the first injection completely blocked the development of hyperalgesia but was ineffective if injected before the second injection. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that anatomically diverse peripheral stimuli can converge within the central nervous system to produce hyperalgesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".