Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les monographies intitulees Property: Meanings, Histories, Theories et Feminist Perspectives on Land Law viennent s’ajouter, en temps opportun, a la bibliographie relativement restreinte sur les theories feministes en matiere de droit des biens. Les deux volumes portent sur les liens entre les biens et l’inegalite. Property: Meanings, Histories, Theories , de la juriste feministe australienne, Margaret Davies, examine le concept de la propriete et les justifications de l’institution de la propriete privee dans le contexte de la pensee liberale occidentale. Ce court volume illustre les objectifs de la serie « Critical Approaches to Law » de Routledge qui vise a publier des oeuvres theoriques critiques, accessibles et interdisciplinaires. Le livre de Davies est une introduction, bien ecrite et bien structuree, a la theorie de la propriete traditionnelle aussi bien que critique, avec suffisamment de profondeur pour presenter une lecture d’interet meme pour les personnes deja au courant de la theorie de la propriete. Le volume Feminist Perspectives on Land Law , dont les deux co-redactrices Hilary Lim et Anne Bottomley, sont des juristes universitaires feministes de la Grande-Bretagne, regroupe une collection non structuree de douze essais. Huit de ces essais portent uniquement sur les lois britanniques concernant les biens fonciers. Meme si la collection peut d’abord sembler un peu limitee du point de vue d’un lectorat canadien, elle presente neanmoins un interet plus vaste car il s’agit d’une tentative d’elaborer une theorie a partir de la base, c’est-a-dire en se fondant sur les conditions materielles qui influent sur l’acces des femmes a la propriete. Abstract: Property: Meanings, Histories, Theories and Feminist Perspectives on Land Law are welcome additions to the relatively small body of feminist theorizing about property law. Both focus on the connections between property and inequality. Property: Meanings, Histories, Theories , written by the Australian legal feminist, Margaret Davies, looks at the concept of property and the justifications of the institution of private property in the context of Western liberal thought. This short book exemplifies the goal of Routledge’s Critical Approaches to Law series to produce accessible, critical, inter-disciplinary, and theoretical work. Davies’s book is a well-written, well-structured introduction to both traditional and critical property theory, with enough depth to be a worthwhile read for those already familiar with property theory. Feminist Perspectives on Land Law , edited by two British feminist legal scholars, Hilary Lim and Anne Bottomley, is an unstructured collection of twelve essays. Eight of those essays concentrate on uniquely British statutes affecting real property. Although it might initially strike a Canadian reader as rather parochial, the collection has broad appeal because it is an effort to build theory from the ground up—that is, based upon the material conditions that affect women’s access to land.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".