MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1521776637 · doi:10.7202/010714ar

L’interprétation en Colombie-Britannique à l’époque des explorations par voie terrestre et de la traite des fourrures dans les comptoirs (1793-1846)

2005· article· fr· W1521776637 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ginette Demers

Bibliographic record

VenueTTR traduction terminologie rédaction · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les journaux tenus par Alexander Mackenzie, Simon Fraser et David Thompson montrent que ce sont surtout des Autochtones qui ont servi d’interprètes pendant leurs voyages de découverte et que ceux-ci ont ainsi grandement contribué à en assurer le succès. Dans les comptoirs établis à la suite de ces explorations, les interprètes étaient essentiels. Le présent article traite de leur statut au sein des compagnies de traite, des dangers que comportait leur métier, de l’influence que certains avaient sur les populations locales et du rôle des femmes comme interprètes et comme enseignantes des langues amérindiennes. On y trouve également une esquisse de la personnalité et de la carrière de quelques interprètes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTTR traduction terminologie rédactionSame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207