The surface tectonics of mantle lithosphere delamination following ocean lithosphere subduction: Insights from physical‐scaled analogue experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many postulated lithospheric removal events occur in regions with an earlier history of subduction, but the relationship between the two processes has not been explored. In this work, we use physical‐scaled analogue experiments to investigate the evolution from ocean lithosphere subduction to collision and possible delamination of the mantle lithosphere from the crust. We test how varying the magnitude of plate convergence alters the behavior of the subduction‐delamination model. Our experiments show that a retreating ocean proplate can evolve to continental mantle lithosphere delamination. Negative surface topography is supported at the delamination hinge, and this migrates back with the peeling lithosphere. With high plate convergence, delamination is suppressed. Rather, the crust and mantle lithosphere split at the collision zone in a form of flake tectonics as oncoming procrust is accreted on top of the retroplate and the promantle lithosphere subducts below. Localized high topography develops at this zone of crustal accretion and thickening. The results suggest that delamination may be a continental continuation of plate retreat and that lithospheric removal is triggered by the transition from one process to another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".