MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522203849 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11202

A statistical test for mixture detection with application to component identification in multidimensional biomolecular NMR studies

2013· article· en· W1522203849 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nicoleta Serban, Pengfei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTest statisticMathematicsStatisticsEstimatorStatistical hypothesis testingComponent (thermodynamics)Regression analysisNonlinear regressionApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We introduce a statistical hypothesis test for detecting mixtures in a nonlinear regression model with mean regression function defined by a weighted sum of two multidimensional unimodal functions, where each unimodal function in the summation representing acomponent. Two regression components are mixed when the distance between their centres is small or the proportion of their contribution to the mean regression function is close to zero or one. Two challenges in model estimation under the null hypothesis of one regression component are that the proportion parameter describing the weighed contribution of each component lies on the boundary of the parameter space and that the model parameters are nonidentifiable. Therefore, the parameter estimators derived from standard nonlinear estimation approaches are inconsistent and unstable. To overcome these challenges, we study a penalized regression test statistic with a relatively simple quadratic approximation which can be used to simulate the quantiles of the test statistic under the null hypothesis. One leading application of the mixture testing procedure is the detection of mixed or overlapped components in multidimensional data generated from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments for protein structure determination. It is important to de‐mix the components since each regression component provides specific information about the structure of the protein. In certain cases, the lack of a small number of essential components can lead to a significant deviation in the predicted structure.The Canadian Journal of Statistics42: 36–60; 2014 © 2013 Statistical Society of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.065
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.289
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0650.289
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207