MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1522354032 · doi:10.1002/uog.12246

P33.09: The importance of imaging in a successful pregnancy complicated by Klippel‐Trenaunay‐Weber syndrome: case report

2012· article· en· W1522354032 on OpenAlexaff
Felipe Moretti, EL AMMARI Jalal, S. S. Singh, G. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiomatosisKlippel-Trenaunay syndromePregnancyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologySurgeryObstetricsSoft tissuePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS) is a rare congenital disease characterized by a triad of extensive cutaneous hemangiomas, venous varicosities and soft tissue or bone hypertrophy asymmetrically affecting one limb. Pregnant patients affected by KTS are at increased risk for thromboembolic events. Paradoxically, they can also suffer major haemorrhage due to rupture of venous varicosities or arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), including uterine angiomatosis. Uteri affected by angiomatosis demonstrate a spongiform appearance and contain anechoic and hypoechoic diagonal lines which represent abnormal vessels. The color Doppler confirms blood flow. In 1997, Richards et al reported a case with massive myometrial angiomatosis which was terminated at 13 weeks. We report a successful term delivery by Caesarean section of a pregnancy complicated by massive widespread uterine and cervical angiomatosis in a patient with KTS. Detail antenatal assessment is crucial to optimize pregnancy outcome and minimize risks in this rare hereditary disorder. In our case, extensive prenatal imaging was performed principally using ultrasound but also supported by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This approach enabled the identification and mapping of areas of potential abnormal vascularisation not only within the uterus but also in the superficial tissues overlying the lumbar spine, lower abdomen, vulva and vagina. Only with this information could the relative risks of vaginal versus Caesarean delivery be judged. Moreover, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended to improve overall patient care. Supporting information can be found in the online version of this abstract. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0090.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicVascular Malformations and HemangiomasFrench-language works237,207