MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1522872244 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-60

Abstract 60: Genotranscriptomic meta-analysis of centromere protein A (CENPA): An essential role in human cancer progression

2015· article· en· W1522872244 on OpenAlexaff
Xia Sun, Sifeng Qu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerCancerBiologyChromosome instabilityMetastasisLocus (genetics)Cancer researchCopy-number variationOncologyGeneticsGeneBioinformaticsChromosomeMedicineGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: As the cancer hallmark, genetic instability caused by abnormal cell division, is characterized with the gain or loss of entire chromosomes. The specific histone-H3 variant, centromere protein-A (CENPA), plays essential role in regulating kinetochore assembly, centromere activity and chromosome stability during cell division. However, the biological function of CENPA in human cancer remains largely uncharacterized. This study aims to determine the prognostic value of CENPA expression in cancer patients and the potential therapeutic target in cancer treatment via the genotranscriptomic meta-analysis. Methods: In order to well address the issue, a comprehensive and unbiased genotranscriptomic meta-analysis of CENPA in human cancers was performed with the clinical patient information databases, i.e. COSMIC, Oncomine and cBioPortal. Results: Based on the analysis, it strongly indicated the widespread cancer promoting role of CENPA. There are no gene fusion, very low point mutation (0.15%) and very rare copy number variation (CNV) gain (0.09%) at the CENPA locus in 15214 patient samples across 33 cancer types. However, transcriptomic analyses indicated high correlation of increased CENPA mRNA levels in various solid cancer tissues compared with normal tissues. Furthermore, the poor clinical outcome among 51 clinical cohorts with different cancer types shows significantly correlation with CENPA up-regulation, especially in breast cancer. More importantly, the CENPA up-regulation is also significantly correlated with the metastasis progression and pathology-assessment in breast cancer patients. The high rank of metastatic related genes correlated with CENPA up-regulation is also confirmed in TCGA breast cancer cohorts. Conclusions: The current study highly indicates the essential cancer promoting role of CENPA in human cancer and its value as prognostic marker in clinical use. It also provides rationale for further investigation of CENPA as potential therapeutic target in breast cancer treatment. Citation Format: Xia Sun, Sifeng Qu. Genotranscriptomic meta-analysis of centromere protein A (CENPA): An essential role in human cancer progression. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 60. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-60

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→