MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523408279 · doi:10.1002/cncr.29540

Majority of survivors of childhood cancer experience comorbidities

2015· article· en· W1523408279 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carrie Printz

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChildhood cancerCancerEpidemiologyCohortIncidence (geometry)GerontologyCancer survivorPediatricsDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimates indicate that although the number of survivors of childhood cancers is increasing, the majority of those who have survived for 5 years or longer have at least 1 chronic health condition, according to new data.1 Researchers, led by Siobhan Phillips, PhD, MPH, assistant professor of preventive medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, estimated the number of survivors of childhood cancer in the United States to be 388,501, an increase of 59,849 from a 2005 estimate by investigators at the NCI. Among the survivors, approximately 84% survived for 5 or more years after diagnosis. The researchers evaluated cancer incidence and survival data recorded between 1975 and 2011 from 9 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (SEER) in the United States and data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. The studies provided information regarding adverse and late effects of cancer treatment from more than 14,000 longterm survivors of childhood cancers at 26 cancer centers across the United States and Canada. Using the probability of each measure of morbidity from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, investigators then multiplied these estimates by the relevant estimate number of US survivors from the SEER data. Dr. Phillips and her colleagues, in collaboration with the NCI and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, found that an estimated 70% of childhood cancer survivors had a mild or moderate chronic condition, whereas an estimated 32% had a severe, disabling, or life-threatening chronic condition. The findings demonstrate that a singular focus on curing cancer does not offer a complete picture of cancer survivorship, Dr. Phillips says, adding that the burden of these chronic conditions is “profound, both in occurrence and severity.” As a result, she urges the cancer community to focus on how to effectively decrease the morbidity burden and develop care and rehabilitation models that optimize longevity and well-being among survivors of childhood cancer. Dr. Phillips says many of the morbidities are somewhat modifiable in the general population; however, the same prevention guidelines may not apply to survivors of childhood cancers. Among the preventive factors that health care researchers and providers need to better understand are physical activity, diet, and the treatment of characteristics that may make survivors more susceptible to these morbidities, she says.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207