MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523775075 · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-133-8_8

Olfactory Ensheathing Cells: Isolation and Culture from the Neonatal Olfactory Bulb

2008· article· en· W1523775075 on OpenAlexaff
Susan C. Barnett, A. Jane Roskams

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods in molecular biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlfactory ensheathing gliaOlfactory bulbOlfactory epitheliumOlfactory systemCribriform plateOlfactory mucosaBiologyNeurogenesisNeuroscienceOlfactory receptorOlfactory nerveOlfactory Receptor CellTransplantationOlfactory tubercleVomeronasal organAnatomyCentral nervous systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), which are glia from the olfactory system, have evolved as attractive candidates for transplant-mediated repair based on long-standing knowledge that the olfactory system is one of the only central nervous system tissues that can support neurogenesis throughout life. After injury and during normal cell turnover, the olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) die, and new nerves are generated from putative stem cells in the olfactory epithelium. OECs, which reside throughout the olfactory system, guide the ORN axons as they travel through the olfactory mucosa (olfactory epithelium and lamina propria) and the cribriform plate, terminating in synapse formation in the usually nonpermissive environment of the olfactory bulb. It is this ability to support axonal outgrowth throughout life that has made olfactory tissue such a promising focus for repair strategies. Here, we provide a method to purify OECs-from the rat olfactory bulb and in Chapter 9, from the turbinates of the mouse olfactory epithelium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods in molecular biologySame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207