MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1523813857 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.191510

Fatigue preconditioning increases fatigue resistance in mouse flexor digitorum brevis muscles with non‐functioning K<sub>ATP</sub>channels

2010· article· en· W1523813857 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Boudreault, Carlo Cifelli, François Bourassa, Kyle Scott, Jean‐Marc Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlibenclamideInternal medicineEndocrinologyChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to determine how an initial fatigue bout (FAT1 at 37°C) affects free myoplasmic Ca(2+) concentration and force ([Ca(2+)](i)/force) during a subsequent fatigue bout (FAT2) in mouse flexor digitorum brevis (FDB). During FAT1, both tetanic [Ca(2+)](i)/force decreased; however, they decreased to significantly lower levels when FAT1 was carried out in the presence of glibenclamide, a sarcolemmal K(ATP) (sK(ATP)) channel blocker. Glibenclamide also elicited greater increases in unstimulated [Ca(2+)](i)/force, which occurred when fibres failed to fully relax between contractions during FAT1. Finally, glibenclamide impaired force recovery after FAT1. The decreases in tetanic [Ca(2+)](i)/force and increases in unstimulated [Ca(2+)](i)/force were slower during FAT2 elicited 60 min after FAT1. Under control conditions, the effects were small with very few significant differences. In the presence of glibenclamide, on the other hand, the differences between FAT1 and FAT2 were very large. Unexpectedly, the differences in unstimulated and tetanic [Ca(2+)](i)/force between control and glibenclamide conditions observed during FAT1 were no longer observed during FAT2. The lack of differences was not related to a failure of glibenclamide to block K(ATP) channels during FAT2 because the effects of FAT1 on FAT2 were also observed using Kir6.2(-/-) mouse FDB, which lack sK(ATP) channel activity. The differences in [Ca(2+)](i)/force between FAT1 and FAT2 could be observed with FAT1 duration of just 30 s and a FAT1-FAT2 interval of at least 30 min. A modulation of factors involved in ischaemic pre-conditioning, i.e. A1-adenosine receptors, sK(ATP) and mitochondrial K(ATP) (mK(ATP)) channels, PKC and reactive oxygen species, during FAT1 had no effect on FAT2 fatigue kinetics. It is concluded that a preceding fatigue bout triggers an acute physiological process that prevents the contractile dysfunction induced by non-functioning K(ATP) channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207