MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1524185158

Pushing Past Barriers: A glimpse of Uganda through a medical student's eyes

2010· article· en· W1524185158 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sabrina Kolker

Bibliographic record

VenueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHealth careMedical emergencyOptometryLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

sickness from the helicopter ride quickly subsided as the overwhelming crowd of local villagers greeted us. In the midst of all the excitement, a mother carrying an infant infected with Yaws (a rare disfiguring infection of the bone and cartilage) caught the corner of my eye. They, as well as others, were expecting us and I was eager to help. A part of me hoped that we, as a medical team, could live up to their expectations. Last summer, I travelled with The Summer Medical Institute Northwest Medical Missions Team to provide healthcare to the isolated villages in Papua, Indonesia. These villages are located up in the mountains and are only accessible via small airplanes and helicopters. There is no electricity, no running water and many still hunt with bows and arrows. The atmosphere truly felt like a picture taken out of the pages from National Geographic. Needless to say, they had very little access to healthcare. With our limited medical supplies, we treated a variety of patients in our clinic: cleaning and dressing wounds, providing B12/ analgesic injections, treating common and complex tropical infectious diseases. Sadly, there were patients with illnesses we could not treat. However, the most memorable patient was a man who I appropriately named the “travelling patient”. After hearing our helicopter fly over his village, he trekked barefoot for 3 days just to see us. As he arrived exhausted with his feet blistered and damaged, I wondered what motivated him to endure such a grueling journey. When asked if it was worth it, he responded with simple yes, and expressed his sincere gratitude for having someone finally care for him. This experience serves as a reminder of how honored we are to be in a profession where patients actively seek our care and help. It serves as one of my driving forces to become a better physician for my future patients. It is a humbling responsibility; one I do not intend to take lightly, and the story of the travelling patient will help me to never forget this privilege. Lessons from the Travelling Patient

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.014
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0100.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journalSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207