MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1524585017

Twenty Years of Comprehensive School Health: A Review and Analysis of Canadian Research Published in Refereed Journals (1989-2009)

2011· review· en· W1524585017 on OpenAlexaffabout
Charlotte Beaudoin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaLibrary scienceHumanitiesDocumentationPolitical scienceSociologyArtEthnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of Comprehensive School Health (CSH) has been an emerging theme in the health promotion and education literature in the past two decades. Although many CSH-type initiatives and programs have been observed in school communities across Canada, we have observed a lack of published research in refereed journals. The purpose of this study was to conduct an extensive review and analysis of the Canadian scientific research published on CSH. A five phase methodology was used that allowed identification of 34 articles. Two waves of publications were identified; (1) 1990 to 1997 (n=11), and (2) 2002 to 2009 (n=20). The first wave has been marked by the studies taking place in Nova Scotia (n=5), while the studies conducted in British Columbia marked the second wave (n=8). However, the value of comprehensive and coordinated school-health approaches among school actors and the links to family and community have been addressed from coast to coast.  Le concept de l’approche globale de sante en milieu scolaire (AGSS) est devenu, en vingt ans, une thematique populaire dans la documentation sur la promotion de la sante en milieu scolaire. Meme si un grand nombre d’initiatives et de programmes axes sur l’AGSS ont ete examinees a travers le Canada, l’auteure a constate que tres peu d’etudes avaient ete publiees a ce sujet dans des revues ou ouvrages arbitres. L’etude presentee ici se voulait donc un examen analytique exhaustif  de la recherche scientifique canadienne publiee sur l’AGSS. Pour ce faire,  une methode en cinq etapes a ete utilisee pour reperer 34 articles. Deux vagues de publications ont ete repertoriees, soit (1) 1990 a 1997 (n=11) et (2) 2002 a 2009 (n=20). La premiere vague reflete surtout les etudes menees en Nouvelle-Ecosse (n=5), alors que la seconde vague (n=8) reflete celles effectuees  en Colombie-Britannique.,Malgre cette dominance d’etudes menees dans certaines provinces,  la valeur d’une approche globale integree en milieu scolaire pour les acteurs scolaires et l’apport des liens avec la famille et la collectivite ont ete pris en compte d’un ocean a l’autre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0130.013
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.529
GPT teacher head0.593
Teacher spread0.064 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207