MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inherited disorders of platelet function and challenges to diagnosis of mucocutaneous bleeding

2010· review· en· W1524846527 on OpenAlexaff
Sara J. Israels, Magdy El Ekiaby, Teresa Quiroga, Diego Mezzano

Bibliographic record

VenueHaemophilia · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateletPlatelet disorderMedicineThrombastheniaBleeding diathesisClot retractionVon Willebrand diseaseMucocutaneous zoneFibrinBlood Platelet DisordersPathologyImmunologyVon Willebrand factorDiseaseThrombinPlatelet aggregation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: Platelets play a pivotal role in the arrest of bleeding at sites of vascular injury. Following endothelial damage, they respond rapidly by adhesion to subendothelial matrix proteins resulting in platelet activation, spreading, aggregation, secretion and recruitment of additional platelets to form the primary haemostatic plug. This mass provides a surface for thrombin generation and fibrin mesh formation that stabilizes the clot. Careful study of patients with inherited platelet disorders and, subsequently, of informative animal models, has identified structural platelet abnormalities that have enhanced our understanding of platelet function. The investigations of rare, but severe, inherited platelet disorders have led us to the discovery of causative molecular defects. One of the most informative is the rare autosomal recessive disorder Glanzmann thrombasthenia, caused by defect or deficiency in the platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3, resulting in absent platelet aggregation and a significant clinical bleeding diathesis. Our new challenge is to understand the mechanisms underlying more common, but less well-defined, mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB) disorders. Present diagnostic testing for platelet function disorders and von Willebrand's Disease often fails to identify the cause of bleeding in individuals with inherited MCB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaemophiliaSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207