The structure of the lipopolysaccharide O‐antigen produced by <i>Flavobacterium psychrophilum</i> (259‐93)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flavobacterium psychrophilum, a Gram-negative bacterium, is the etiological agent of rainbow trout fry syndrome and bacterial cold water disease, septicemic infections in reared salmonids. In humans Flavobacterium spp. have been associated with neonatal meningitis and septicemia, catheter-associated bacteremia, and pneumonia. Recently, several F. psychrophilum surface molecules, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have been implicated in its pathogenesis and identified as potential vaccine and diagnostic candidate macromolecules. Studies on the LPS produced by the bacterium are reported herein. The structure of the antigenic O-polysaccharide contained in the LPS of F. psychrophilum was deduced by the application of analytical NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, glycose and methylation analysis, and partial hydrolysis degradations, and was found to be an unbranched polymer of trisaccharide repeating units composed of L-rhamnose (L-Rhap), 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-L-fucose (L-FucpNAc) and 2-acetamido-4-((3S,5S)-3,5-dihydroxyhexanamido)-2,4-dideoxy-D-quinovose (D-Quip2NAc4NR, 2-N-acetyl-4-N-((3S,5S)-3,5-dihydroxyhexanoyl)-D-bacillosamine) (1 : 1 : 1) and having the structure: -->4)-alpha-L-FucpNAc-(1-->3)-alpha-D-Quip2NAc4NR-(1-->2)- alpha-L-Rhap-(1--> where R is (3S,5S)-CH3CH(OH)CH2CH(OH)CH2CO-.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".