Managing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies: The Ontario Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Province of Ontario developed the Critical Infrastructure Assurance Program based upon risk management, business continuity process, and the collaboration of three levels of government and the private sector. It addresses the resiliency of systems and networks and their ability to function at some level throughout a threat. It is an all‐hazards approach that concentrates its efforts in the prevention and mitigation pillars of emergency management. The systems are addressed by sectors and their information sharing networks are an integral part of the program. The program includes a modeling program that is fed by the work of the sectors and addresses the strength of relationships amongst the sectors’ dependencies and interdependencies. The program's work is validated through an annual interdependency exercise involving all sectors and smaller exercises on particular threats or identified vulnerabilities between sectors. The most valuable part of the program is the sharing of knowledge throught the information‐sharing network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it