DE RALPH ELLISON (INVISIBLE MAN, EUA) A MAX DORSINVILLE (JAMES WAIT ET LES LUNETTES NOIRES, QUÉBEC): NEGRITUDE E METÁFORAS DA FRONTEIRA.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho é um estudo de contatos interétnicos que demonstra a dificuldade da transculturalidade no cotidiano dos negros vivendo no Canadá e nos Estados Unidos. São aqui apresentados e analisados os ambientes, seus valores impressivos (locus amoenus, disforia), suas conotações metafóricas e míticas. Nota-se que a dinâmica dos textos é impulsionada pela busca de identidade dos protagonistas, que a pesquisa põe em destaque ao explorar as noções topológicas em uso na poética pós-colonial (fronteira, travessia, arquipélago).Résumé: Ce travail est une étude de contacts interethniques qui démontre la difficulté de la transculturalité. Sont ici présentés les contextes, leurs valeurs impressives (locus amoenus, dysphorie), leurs connotations métaphoriques et mythiques. Mais la dynamique des textes reçoit leur impulsion de la quête d’identité des protagonistes, que la recherche met en relief en exploitant les notions topologiques qui ont cours dans les études postcoloniales (frontière, traversée, archipel).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".