MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526201516 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.077636

Excitatory purinergic neurotransmission in smooth muscle of guniea‐pig taenia caeci

2005· article· en· W1526201516 on OpenAlexaff
Yong Zhang, William G. Paterson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApaminGuanethidineNeurotransmissionHexamethoniumInhibitory postsynaptic potentialExcitatory postsynaptic potentialEndocrinologyInternal medicinePurinergic receptorTetrodotoxinChemistryChannel blockerMembrane potentialAcetylcholinePharmacologyPotassium channelBiologyStimulationReceptorMedicineBiochemistryCalcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) inhibitory neurotransmission has been an area of intense interest in gut motor physiology, whereas excitatory NANC neurotransmission has received less attention. In order to further explore excitatory NANC neurotransmission, we performed conventional intracellular recordings from guinea-pig taenia caeci smooth muscle. Tissue was perfused with oxygenated Krebs solution at 35 degrees C and nerve responses evoked by either oral or aboral nerve stimulation (NS) (4 square wave pulses, 0.3 ms duration, 20 Hz). Electrical activity was characterized by slow waves upon which one to three action potentials were superimposed. Oral NS evoked an inhibitory junction potential (IJP) at either the valley or peak of the slow wave. Application of nifedipine (1 microM) abolished slow waves and action potentials, but membrane potential flunctuations (1-3 mV) and IJPs remained unaffected. Concomitant application of apamin (300 nM), a small-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel blocker, converted the IJP to an EJP that was followed by slow IJP. Further administration of N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, 200 microM), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, abolished the slow IJP without affecting the EJP, implying that the slow IJP is due to nitrergic innervation. The EJP was abolished by tetrodotoxin (1 microM), but was not significantly affected by atropine (3 microM) and guanethidine (3 microM) or hexamethonium (500 microM). Substance P (SP, 1 microM) desensitization caused slight attenuation of the EJP, but the EJP was abolished by desensitization with alpha,beta-methylene ATP (50 microM), a P2 purinoceptor agonist that is more potent than ATP at the P2X receptor subtype, suramin (100 microM), a non-selective P2 purinoceptor antagonist, and pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulphonic acid (PPADS, 100 microM) , a selective P2X purinoceptor antagonist. In contrast, the EJP was unaffected by MRS-2179 (2 microM), a selective P2Y(1) receptor antagonist. Aboral NS evoked an apamin- and l-NAME-sensitive IJP, but virtually no NANC EJP. These data suggest the presence of polarized excitatory purinergic neurotransmission in guinea-pig taenia caeci, which appears to be mediated by P2X purinoceptors, most likely the P2X(1) subtype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207