Bibliographic record
Abstract
There have been many notions in burgeoise theory about the stages of economic growth, the best known being Walt Whitman Rostow’s (N.Y 1914) and John K. Galbraith’s ( Canada 1908); in both cases their anti-Marxist statements are obvioves and their pretention to demostrate a future for humanity stemmning from the American model.It is interesting to approach an up to date point of view about the topic and here we make reference to the theory of one of the best known theoriticians of contemporany capitalism, Peter Drucker, opened to public opinion in 1993 in the boock the Post Capitalist Society. His main criteria takes as busis the trasformation of the property regime under the new conditions of contemprany Capitalism, where according to his opinion, knowledge is the main means of production, which belongs to those who own them, theis, private properly as a vehicle for explotaiton, vanishes. There emerges then what the author ealls capitalism without capitalists. The present paper considers the logical process of the development of knowledge and the way it has come to help humanity. Nevertheliss, this does not mean the acquisition by man of supra social dimensions leading to the transformation of present capitalism into somnething different from what it really is.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".