Sociedad post capitalista o capitalismo moderno
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There have been many notions in burgeoise theory about the stages of economic growth, the best known being Walt Whitman Rostow’s (N.Y 1914) and John K. Galbraith’s ( Canada 1908); in both cases their anti-Marxist statements are obvioves and their pretention to demostrate a future for humanity stemmning from the American model.It is interesting to approach an up to date point of view about the topic and here we make reference to the theory of one of the best known theoriticians of contemporany capitalism, Peter Drucker, opened to public opinion in 1993 in the boock the Post Capitalist Society. His main criteria takes as busis the trasformation of the property regime under the new conditions of contemprany Capitalism, where according to his opinion, knowledge is the main means of production, which belongs to those who own them, theis, private properly as a vehicle for explotaiton, vanishes. There emerges then what the author ealls capitalism without capitalists. The present paper considers the logical process of the development of knowledge and the way it has come to help humanity. Nevertheliss, this does not mean the acquisition by man of supra social dimensions leading to the transformation of present capitalism into somnething different from what it really is.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it