MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1527507139

Lord, Giver of Life: Toward a Pneumatological Complement to George Lindbeck's Theory of Doctrine

2008· article· en· W1527507139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglican Theological Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoctrinePhilosophyMetaphysicsLithificationChristologyEpistemologyTheologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lord, Giver of Life: Toward a Pneumatological Complement to George Lindbeck's Theory of Doctrine. By Jane Barter Moulaison. Toronto, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2006. 180 pp. $65.00 (cloth). In Lord, Giver of Life, Jane Barter Moulaison examines George Lindbeck's theory of doctrine, focusing on pneumatological aspects in Lindbeck's work. She puts Lindbeck's cultural-linguistic model in dialogue with an interesting mix of theological approaches by Lindbeck's supporters and detractors, and with patristic theologians. Moulaison s intent to push Lindbeck's cultural-linguistic model into new areas, which she does while trying to answer relevant contemporary questions. This book will be most useful for scholars interested in Lindbeck's pneumatology. Other scholars and graduate students will also find that this hook contributes an original perspective to understanding Lindbeck's theology. In first chapter, Spirit Who Saves, Moulaison introduces book and her method. She identifies three regulative principles in Lindbeck's work: monotheism, historical specificity, and Christological maximalism. She then adds pneumatology as a fourth regulative principle based on Trinity, Moulaison writes that adding a reconstruction of pneumatological confession is not intended merely to expose Lindbeck's faulty recollection of historical doctrine; rather, it meant to consider this surprisingly pre-empted reconstruction of historical doctrine as an intriguing clue as to what might be overlooked within his own constructive theology (p. 8). By following Lindbeck's concern in The Nature of Doctrine, Moulaison answers Lindbeck's critics by theologically addressing anthropological concerns of formalism. In second chapter, Moulaison defends Lindbeck against critics who contend there an ontological deficit in The Nature of Doctrine. She asserts that ecumenism primary question Lindbeck addressing. Moulaison describes the picture of theological language that holds us captive in first section (pp. 16-22), and second and third sections address epistemological and doctrinal questions. In chapter 3, Moulaison places Lindbeck in conversation with Alister McGrath and Cappadocian fathers. She writes that her second chapter animated by a quest for an adequate account of relationship between res significata (the thing that signified) and modus significandi (way of signification) (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it