Lord, Giver of Life: Toward a Pneumatological Complement to George Lindbeck's Theory of Doctrine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lord, Giver of Life: Toward a Pneumatological Complement to George Lindbeck's Theory of Doctrine. By Jane Barter Moulaison. Toronto, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2006. 180 pp. $65.00 (cloth). In Lord, Giver of Life, Jane Barter Moulaison examines George Lindbeck's theory of doctrine, focusing on pneumatological aspects in Lindbeck's work. She puts Lindbeck's cultural-linguistic model in dialogue with an interesting mix of theological approaches by Lindbeck's supporters and detractors, and with patristic theologians. Moulaison s intent to push Lindbeck's cultural-linguistic model into new areas, which she does while trying to answer relevant contemporary questions. This book will be most useful for scholars interested in Lindbeck's pneumatology. Other scholars and graduate students will also find that this hook contributes an original perspective to understanding Lindbeck's theology. In first chapter, Spirit Who Saves, Moulaison introduces book and her method. She identifies three regulative principles in Lindbeck's work: monotheism, historical specificity, and Christological maximalism. She then adds pneumatology as a fourth regulative principle based on Trinity, Moulaison writes that adding a reconstruction of pneumatological confession is not intended merely to expose Lindbeck's faulty recollection of historical doctrine; rather, it meant to consider this surprisingly pre-empted reconstruction of historical doctrine as an intriguing clue as to what might be overlooked within his own constructive theology (p. 8). By following Lindbeck's concern in The Nature of Doctrine, Moulaison answers Lindbeck's critics by theologically addressing anthropological concerns of formalism. In second chapter, Moulaison defends Lindbeck against critics who contend there an ontological deficit in The Nature of Doctrine. She asserts that ecumenism primary question Lindbeck addressing. Moulaison describes the picture of theological language that holds us captive in first section (pp. 16-22), and second and third sections address epistemological and doctrinal questions. In chapter 3, Moulaison places Lindbeck in conversation with Alister McGrath and Cappadocian fathers. She writes that her second chapter animated by a quest for an adequate account of relationship between res significata (the thing that signified) and modus significandi (way of signification) (p. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".