Allergic humans are hypo‐responsive to CXCR3 chemokines in a Th1 immunity‐promoting loop
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CXCR3 binding chemokine CXCL10 (IP-10) markedly enhances antigen-specific Th1 recall responses in healthy humans, suggesting a role for this pathway in maintenance of clinical tolerance to environmental allergens as well as a potential therapeutic role for CXCR3 ligands in re-balancing the Th2-dominated responses that underlie generation and maintenance of allergic disorders. Here, we investigated the capacity of CXCR3 ligands to modulate allergen-driven IFNgamma production by healthy and allergic individuals characterized by Th1 and Th2 immunity-dominated allergen specific responses, respectively. Exogenous CXCR3 ligands up-regulated antigen-dependent IFNgamma production from healthy individuals' peripheral blood mononuclear cells up to 120-fold, a response neutralized by anti-CXCR3 treatment and not emulated by CCR5 ligands. In contrast, allergic individuals were strikingly hypo-responsive to CXCR3 ligands (P=0.0004). Chemokine-enhanced IFNgamma production correlated with T cell CXCR3 expression (r=0.736, P=0.0001) in vivo and was independent of Th2 cytokine levels. These findings demonstrate that CXCR3-ligation preferentially augments ongoing Th1 over Th2 responses and suggest that reduced capacity of allergic individuals to respond to CXCR3 ligands promotes the maintenance of human allergic disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".