MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1527971986 · doi:10.29173/cjs10388

Shamus Rahman Khan, Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School

2011· article· en· W1527971986 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Janice Aurini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElitePrivilege (computing)SociologyGender studiesPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P rivilege takes us into the world of St. Paul's, an exclusive boarding school, to examine the new American elite.In this well written ethnography, Khan returns to his alma mater as a teacher and researcher and discovers a transformed institution.Gone are the minority student dorms and (overt) expressions of old money and connections.In its place, the school prides itself on its racial diversity, the inclusion of women, and scholarships that allow superb disadvantaged students an education at St. Paul's.Years after graduating, Khan finds himself in a school that eschews notions of "who you are" in favour of "what you've done."Students who rely too heavily on family legacies are sequestered, and reside in a new version of a minority dorm Khan found himself in almost twenty years before.The faculty, staff and students aspire to model a world of diversity, cultural flexibility and hard work.Although much has changed at St. Paul's, the fundamental mission of the school remains.Students at St. Paul's learn how to embody privilege, much as they have throughout the school's 150 year history.What we learn from Khan is that while the method of doing privilege has changed, the ability of the elite to reproduce themselves has remained remarkably stable.Perhaps more problematic is that the new language of meritocracy (what you do, rather than who you are) allows them to frame their position as the sole result of talent and hard work.Students at St. Paul's learn to explain their good fortunes as a result of these qualities, and by default in contrast to the lack of these traits among the less advantaged.Do students at St. Paul's work hard?Through his year long tenure at St. Paul's, Khan learns that the most successful students are not necessarily the hardest working.He notes that many women, minority, and scholarship students work harder, seeing St. Paul's as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.The cruel irony is that while these students are memorizing Plato, their more successful peers are learning to embody what Khan refers to as the "ease of privilege."Masters of this lesson cultivate a distinct way of carrying themselves.They feel at ease in a variety of social settings, and learn an interactional style that allows them to "cre-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0220.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207