MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1528195165 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-1687

Abstract 1687: A BRCA2-targeting antisense oligodeoxynucleotide enhances cisplatin effectiveness by decreasing human tumor cell proliferation, metastatic frequency, and metabolic response

2014· article· en· W1528195165 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mateusz Rytelewski, Jessica Tong, Adrian Buensuceso, Hon S. Leong, Peter Ferguson, Saman Maleki Vareki, Christine Di Cresce, Larissa Romanow, Trevor G. Shepherd, Bonnie J. Deroo, Ann F. Chambers, Mark Vincent, James Koropatnick

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCisplatinRAD51Cancer researchCancer cellDNA repairCancerA549 cellHomologous recombinationBiologyPopulationMolecular biologyCellMedicineInternal medicineChemotherapyDNABiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BRCA2 is involved in homologous recombination repair of double-stranded DNA breaks in human cells. Inactivating mutations in BRCA2 predispose to early onset cancer of the breast, ovary and other tissues. However, patients with tumors that harbor BRCA2 mutations respond better to cancer therapy. Therefore, reducing BRCA2 in cancer cells capable of homologous recombination repair may sensitize otherwise resistant tumors to DNA-damaging anti-cancer treatment. We developed a second generation antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (BR-1) that specifically targets BRCA2. BR-1 decreased BRCA2 mRNA and protein and inhibited BRCA2-mediated RAD51 repair focus formation. BR-1 potently sensitized A549 (lung), SKOV-3 (ovarian), and MDA-MB-231 (breast) cells to cisplatin as evidenced by decreased cell proliferation. However, non-cancerous HK-2 kidney cells were not sensitized to cisplatin by BR-1. In A549 cells BR-1 enhanced cisplatin or ionizing radiation-induced inhibition of in vitro colony formation. Cisplatin-resistant head and neck squamous cancer cells (HN-15a) were rendered as sensitive to cisplatin following BR-1 treatment as the parent population. In addition, BR-1 plus cisplatin treatment decreased A549 cell metastatic frequency in an in vivo chicken chorio-allantoic membrane (CAM) model by over 70% when compared with drug treatment alone. Treatment with BR-1 and cisplatin decreased cellular respiration (decreased oxygen consumption) compared to control oligonucleotide plus cisplatin treatment, suggesting that downregulation of BRCA2 in the context of platinating drug treatment alters cellular metabolism. This change in respiration occurred independently of changes in mitochondrial number. We are continuing to develop and test BR-1 with the aim of applying it in an adjuvant setting with cisplatin in human clinical trials in the future. Supported by grants from the Ontario Centres of Excellence (OCE) Citation Format: Mateusz Rytelewski, Jessica Tong, Adrian Buensuceso, Hon Leong, Peter Ferguson, Saman Maleki Vareki, Christine Di Cresce, Larissa Romanow, Trevor Shepherd, Bonnie Deroo, Ann Chambers, Mark Vincent, James Koropatnick. A BRCA2-targeting antisense oligodeoxynucleotide enhances cisplatin effectiveness by decreasing human tumor cell proliferation, metastatic frequency, and metabolic response. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1687. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1687

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→