MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528352005 · doi:10.1063/1.3258646

Isotope effects in liquid water by infrared spectroscopy. III. H2O and D2O spectra from 6000tocm−1

2009· article· en· W1528352005 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Joseph Ma×, Camille Chapados

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfrared spectroscopyAbsorbanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Spectral lineInfraredLiquid waterHeavy waterSpectroscopyWater vaporIsotopeChemistryAbsorption spectroscopyRefractive indexAbsorption (acoustics)Materials scienceOpticsAtomic physicsPhysicsDeuteriumChromatographyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared spectra (IR) of pure liquid light (H(2)O) and heavy (D(2)O) water were obtained with attenuated total reflection (ATR) and transmission measurements in the mid-IR and far-IR. With these and with other values obtained from the literature, the real (n) and imaginary parts (k) of the refractive index were meticulously derived in the complete IR region from 6000 to 0 cm(-1). The reliability of the results resides in the critical comparison of our experimental data with that obtained from other laboratories and between calculated and experimental spectra, obtained by ATR and transmission techniques. The new optical properties (n and k) can now be used as standards for liquid H(2)O and D(2)O. To these we have added the water (H and D) absorption coefficients (K) that are derived from the k values. These can be used as references for spectra obtained by transmission with an absorbance intensity scale because they are almost the same.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations307
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207