MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528352005 · doi:10.1063/1.3258646

Isotope effects in liquid water by infrared spectroscopy. III. H2O and D2O spectra from 6000tocm−1

2009· article· en· W1528352005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfrared spectroscopyAbsorbanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Spectral lineInfraredLiquid waterHeavy waterSpectroscopyWater vaporIsotopeChemistryAbsorption spectroscopyRefractive indexAbsorption (acoustics)Materials scienceOpticsAtomic physicsPhysicsDeuteriumChromatographyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared spectra (IR) of pure liquid light (H(2)O) and heavy (D(2)O) water were obtained with attenuated total reflection (ATR) and transmission measurements in the mid-IR and far-IR. With these and with other values obtained from the literature, the real (n) and imaginary parts (k) of the refractive index were meticulously derived in the complete IR region from 6000 to 0 cm(-1). The reliability of the results resides in the critical comparison of our experimental data with that obtained from other laboratories and between calculated and experimental spectra, obtained by ATR and transmission techniques. The new optical properties (n and k) can now be used as standards for liquid H(2)O and D(2)O. To these we have added the water (H and D) absorption coefficients (K) that are derived from the k values. These can be used as references for spectra obtained by transmission with an absorbance intensity scale because they are almost the same.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it