Self-Contained Antenna Array Calibration using GNSS Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antenna array processing techniques require calibration algorithms that often rely on the availability of signal sources at known locations, a good knowledge of the array manifold, or a reference antenna. An alternative is provided by GNSS signals that provide the location of their sources as part of their navigation data. In this paper, a projection methodology using GNSS signals is proposed for the calibration of antenna arrays. The Gram Schmidt process is used along with the properties of the signal steering vectors to determine linear relationships between the recovered signals and the calibration parameters. The obtained system of equations is then solved in the Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) sense leading to the estimated calibration parameters. The proposed algorithm accounts for signal gain/phase mismatches and mutual coupling between array elements. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed technique and its suitability for beamforming and Direction-of-Arrival (DoA) applications is supported by several experiments performed using live GPS signals and a GNSS software receiver. Copyright © 2012 Institute of Navigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it