Amphipathic DNA Polymers are Candidate Vaginal Microbicides and Block Herpes Simplex Virus Binding, Entry and Viral Gene Expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amphipathic DNA polymers are promising therapies for the prevention of HIV and genital herpes infections. Recent studies on a panel of such compounds indicated potent activity against HIV binding and entry. This current study was conducted to explore the anti-herpes simplex virus (HSV) activity of the same panel of compounds and to determine their mechanism of activity. METHODS: The anti-HSV activity of a 40-nucleotide degenerate polymer (REP 9), a 40-nucleotide polycytidine amphipathic DNA polymer (REP 9C) and an analogue lacking amphipathic activity (Randomer 3) were compared in plaque reduction assays in the absence or presence of human genital tract secretions; the mechanisms of anti-HSV activity were explored. RESULTS: REP 9 inhibited HSV infection 10,000-fold, whereas Randomer 3 displayed no anti-HSV activity. The antiviral activity was independent of sequence but was dependent on size: the most potent activity was observed for analogues of 40 nucleotides in length. Mechanistic studies indicated that REP 9 and REP 9C blocked HSV-2 binding and entry, were active when added post-entry, inhibited viral gene expression and blocked HSV-induced apoptosis. Confocal microscopy studies showed rapid delivery of fluorescently tagged REP 9 and REP 9C into human epithelial cells, and delivery was significantly greater in infected cells as compared with uninfected cells. REP 9 exhibited no cytotoxicity and retained anti-HSV activity in the presence of cervicovaginal secretions and when virus was introduced in seminal plasma. CONCLUSIONS: REP 9 and REP 9C represent a novel class of antiviral agents that act by multiple mechanisms. These compounds warrant further development for systemic or topical delivery for the prevention and treatment of HIV and HSV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".