EFFECTS OF UV‐B RADIATION ON THE D1 PROTEIN REPAIR CYCLE OF NATURAL PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES FROM THREE LATITUDES (CANADA, BRAZIL, AND ARGENTINA)<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultraviolet radiation effects were examined in natural phytoplankton communities from Rimouski (Canada), Ubatuba (Brazil), and Ushuaia (Argentina). Outdoor pump‐mixed mesocosms were submitted to ambient solar radiation (NUVB) and ambient with additional UV‐B radiation (UVBR) from lamps (HUVB), corresponding to a local 60% ozone depletion scenario. At all sites, neither algal biomass nor dark‐adapted F v /F m were significantly affected by additional UVBR, suggesting the presence of active UV protection or repair mechanisms. To examine the role of D1 protein turnover, essential for PSII repair, short‐term surface incubations were performed in the presence or absence of lincomycin, a chloroplast protein synthesis inhibitor. Effects on PSII were determined using chl a in vivo fluorescence, whereas the D1 protein was detected immunochemically. In the absence of D1 repair, D1 pools and F v /F m decreased to a similar extent under both light treatments. In the presence of D1 repair, D1 pools suffered faster net degradation under HUVB compared with NUVB, whereas F v /F m was maintained for both light treatments, suggesting that HUVB exposure in field populations had more effect on D1 synthesis and PSII repair than on D1 degradation. The fewer undamaged reaction centers remaining in phytoplankton under HUVB were able to maintain F v /F m or actually recovered during the dark acclimation before F v /F m measurements. The D1 pools suffered faster net degradation at the tropical site where high irradiance drove faster D1 degradation and high water temperature enabled fast enzymatic activities. This study shows the crucial role of dynamic changes in D1 turnover in the photobiology of natural planktonic communities across a range of latitudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".