Xhuyaa et Ts’ehk’i : les traductions de deux versions des hauts faits du corbeau et l’éthique de la traduction des récits traditionnels des Premières Nations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article compare trois traductions de la version haïda skidegate des hauts faits du corbeau, le « trickster » des Premières Nations du nord-ouest de l’Amérique, à une traduction de la version tuchoni septentrionale du même mythe. Les trois traductions du récit haïda ont été effectuées par trois universitaires non autochtones, qui ont tous eu recours à des interprètes haïdas, dont ils ont ensuite modifié les traductions avant de les publier. L’analyse de ces traductions révèle plus de similarités que de différences entre les trois textes d’arrivée et une tendance généralisée à l’occidentalisation. La traduction de la version tuchoni septentrionale du même mythe, réalisée par un aîné de cette nation yukonnaise, s’avère cependant fidèle aux traditions amérindiennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".