The dielectric behavior of plasma-treated insulator surfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel technique of treating insulator surfaces by means of a suitable plasma is presented. It suppresses the presence of hydrophilic ions or groups on the surfaces of glass and porcelain insulators and makes the formation of a hydrophobic surface possible. Experimental results show that the plasma-treated surfaces of the glass and the porcelain insulators exhibit excellent stability during accelerated aging test under thermal stress and exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and also after immersion in solvent, acid, or alkali solutions. The AC flashover voltage is 56% higher for the insulators with plasma treatment than those without such treatment under an artificial fog condition (with salt density of 0.1 mg/cm/sup 3/). The surface resistance is about three times higher under the same artificial fog condition for the insulators with plasma treatment. On the basis of an analysis of secondary ion mass spectroscopy and infrared spectra results, the mechanisms responsible for the formation of a stable and effective hydrophobic surface by plasma treatment are discussed.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it