Fragility and functional status of institutionalized elderly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Averiguar a associação entre a fragilidade nesses idosos e a variável clínica status funcional. Método: Pesquisa de campo, de natureza quantitativa, da qual participaram 22 idosos. Os dados foram coletados por meio da Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), o Índex de Katz e a escala de Lawton e analisados no SPSS for Windows. A pesquisa foi aprovada pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa sob CAAE n° 0031.0.470.000-11. Resultados: Evidenciou-se grande parte dos idosos possuíam algum tipo de fragilidade (63,7%) e apresentavam boa capacidade funcional para realização das atividades de vida diárias (41,8%). No entanto, 59% apresentavam algum tipo de dependência ou necessidade de auxílio para realização das atividades instrumentais diárias. Conclusão: Há uma necessidade uma assistência qualificada e voltada para melhoria da qualidade de vida e independência dos idosos fragilizados, inclusive nas instituições de longa permanência.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".