Post-publication record
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since its discovery in 2000, neuroglobin (Nb) has been demonstrated to have an essential and conserved function in vertebrates with the consequential discovery of a neuroprotective role. Nb is a member of the globin superfamily and is predominantly expressed in neurons of the central and peripheral nervous system. Thorough studies have been performed to elucidate the molecular structure of Nb and its ligand binding characteristics. The precise physiological function and mechanism of action of Nb is beginning to be established, with a number of hypotheses having been put forward. While Nb shares an intrinsic affinity for low-molecular weight diatomic gases similar to other globins, the relatively low level of Nb expression in cerebral neurons places limitations on its potential to function as a reservoir for oxygen, especially during periods of acute ischemia. In vitro studies have suggested that the neuroprotective role of Nb may be due to its ability to scavenge reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species. However other studies have proposed Nb as being part of a signalling chain that transmits the redox state of the cell that is protective against oxidative stress or that inhibits apoptosis. This review is intended to summarize the structural, genomic and functional data on neuroglobin to date, thereby providing perspectives for future research on these molecules that may have substantial biomedical implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".