MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529261164 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab306

306 SPONTANEOUS AND PARTHENOGENETIC ACTIVATION OF RAT OOCYTES

2004· article· en· W1529261164 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jae Gyu Yoo, Lawrence C. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsCanadian Veterinary Medical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOocyte activationOocyteAndrologyTheriogenologyTelophaseParthenogenesisAnaphaseReproductive technologyBiologyOogenesisChemistryMolecular biologyAnatomyCell biologyMedicineEmbryoEmbryogenesisGeneticsCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oocyte activation is one of the critical steps for the success in a mammalian cloning program. In rats, information regarding parthenogenetic activation of oocytes is limited and further studies are required to elucidate the phenomenon of spontaneous activation and to develop effective protocols of induced activation. The objectives of the study were (1) to characterize the kinetics of spontaneous activation and (2) to examine different activation regimens for rat oocytes. Oocytes were collected from 3–4-wk-old PMSG-primed Sprague Dawley rats at 14 h after hCG injection. HEPES-mR1ECM was used for oocyte collection and mR1ECM for in vitro culture (Miyoshi et al., 1995 J. Reprod. Fert. 103, 27–32). Experiment 1: Cumulus-denuded oocytes were fixed and stained with bisbenzimide (Hoechst 33342) at 10, 40, 70, 100 and 130 min after recovery. Most oocytes (92.9%) were still arrested in the metaphase II stage at 10 min after recovery, but the proportion of activated oocytes increased in a time-dependent manner, i.e. at 40 min after recovery 50% were at anaphase. At 70 min, 32.4%, 40.5%, 8.1%; at 100 min, 4.8%, 57.1%, 23.8%; and at 130 min, 0%, 3.3%, 86.7% had progressed to anaphase II, telophase II and extruded a 2nd PB, respectively. Experiment 2: Oocytes were exposed to the following activation treatments: Two sets of electrical stimuli (ES) 1 h apart composed of 3 DC pulses, 1 s apart of 1.2 kV cm-1 field strength and 60 µs duration in 0.25 M mannitol solution (Roh et al., 2003 Reprod. Fert. and Dev., 15, 135–140). After ES treatment, oocytes were exposed for 3 h to either cycloheximide (CHX, 10 µg mL-1, Group 1), 6-dimethylaminopurine (DMAP, 2 mM, Group 2), or CHX (10 µg mL-1) and DMAP (2 mM) (Group 3). Group 4 was exposed to Strontium (10 mM) for 1 h and then incubated with CHX (10 µg mL-1) and DMAP (2 mM) for 3 h. Oocytes were washed thoroughly after treatment, transferred to 50-µL droplets of mR1ECM and cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% O2, 5% CO2 and 90% N2. Pronuclear formation and cleavage rates were significantly higher in Groups 2 and 3 than in Groups 1 and 4 (92.6%, 88.9% and 84.6%, 80.8% v. 49.1%, 45.6% and 62.8%, 55.8%, respectively). First, these results show that rat oocytes undergo spontaneous activation very rapidly after recovery from the oviducts. Second, activation protocols with two sets of triple DC electrical stimulation followed by exposure to DMAP or CHX/DMAP are effective means of activation. In conclusion, the above information will be useful in establishing effective protocols for cloning rats. (Financial support by NSERC and Canada Research Chairs.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.426
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207