MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529288338 · doi:10.4271/2009-01-2576

Results of Manned Shelter Testing in Underground Mines

2009· article· en· W1529288338 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas M. Daley, Ken Worobec

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsCameco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMining engineeringAeronauticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the event of a mine emergency that prevents escape, shelter and await rescue may be the best option. Shelter systems have been used in numerous applications over the decades; fall out shelters, control room shelters, and submarine escape compartments to name a few. This paper will report the atmosphere control capabilities of manned shelter tests conducted at the Logan, West Virginia coal mine in September 2007 and at the Cameco McArthur River uranium mine in August 2008. Micropore teamed with Mine Lifeline LLC to support the Logan test and with Cameco Corp. to conduct the McArthur River test. For these manned tests, carbon dioxide was controlled by deploying ExtendAir® brand CO2 absorbent lithium hydroxide curtains manufactured by Micropore, Inc.. Oxygen was supplied into the shelter from high pressure cylinders via pressure regulators. The ExtendAir® lithium hydroxide curtains and the make-up oxygen were set out based on a predetermined schedule. A common goal of these tests was to demonstrate the proper function of the atmosphere control system and validate the deployment schedule for carbon dioxide control curtains and make-up oxygen. This paper will report the carbon dioxide concentrations and ExtendAir® absorbent curtain performance over the course of the test. Ambient oxygen concentration and oxygen supply rate will also be reported. Both tests were completed successfully. The refuge chambers maintained a life supporting atmosphere with comfortable ambient temperature and humidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207