Hypertension after pediatric cardiac transplantation: Detection, etiology, implications and management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Roche SL, O’Sullivan JJ, Kantor PF. Hypertension after pediatric cardiac transplantation: Detection, etiology, implications and management. Pediatr Transplantation 2010:14: 159–168. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Abstract: While it may rescue children with end-stage heart failure from impending catastrophe, cardiac transplantation leaves 50–70% of pediatric recipients with new-onset hypertension. Given the unique vulnerability of the heart and kidneys in these children, we can expect long-term uncontrolled hypertension to shorten both graft and patient survival. In this review we discuss the multi-factorial etiology of post-transplant hypertension, highlighting current uncertainties and emphasizing mechanisms specific to cardiac recipients. We consider the optimal means of monitoring BP and in particular, the advantages of 24 h-ABP over intermittent clinic measurements. We also review BP treatment after cardiac transplantation, drawing attention to specific cautions appropriate when prescribing antihypertensive agents in these circumstances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".