An economic model for \font\twelveit=cmti10 scaled 1600$\overline{\kern‐0.85ex\hbox{\twelveit X}}$\nopagenumbers\end and <i>R</i> charts with time‐varying parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper proposes an economic model for the selection of time‐varying control chart parameters for monitoring on‐line the mean and variance of a normally distributed quality characteristic. The process is subject to two independent assignable causes. One cause changes the process mean and the other changes the process variance. The occurrence times of these assignable causes are described by Weibull distributions having increasing failure rates. The paper combines two existing models: (I) the model of Ohta and Rahim ( IIE Transactions 1997; 29 :481–486) for a dynamic economic design of $\overline{X}$\nopagenumbers\end control charts, where a single assignable cause occurs according to a Weibull distribution and all design parameters are time varying; (II) the model of Costa and Rahim ( QRE International 2000; 16 :143–156) for the joint economic design of $\overline{X}$\nopagenumbers\end and R control charts where two assignable causes occur independently according to Weibull distribution, with variable sampling intervals. The advantages of the proposed model over traditional $\overline{X}$\nopagenumbers\end and R control charts with fixed parameters are presented. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it