MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529840663

De 'Fraise et chocolat' à 'Buzz-moi' d’aurélia aurita [sic]. D’un journal érographique à la mise en scène d’une mise à nu dans le contexte du « tout dire »

2013· article· fr· W1529840663 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Reyns-Chikuma, Marine Gheno

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesMarketing buzzComicsAurelia auritaArt historyEthnologySociologyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le « buzz » mediatique autour de la bande dessinee Fraise et Chocolat souleve de nombreuses questions sur les femmes dans le monde artistique francais. L’auteure, aurelia aurita (qu’elle signe elle-meme sans majuscules) semble cumuler les barrieres a franchir en art : une femme, d’origine asiatique, creant une BD erotique. De nombreuses references a d’autres auteures du « tout dire » telles que Virginie Despentes ( Baise-moi ), Christine Angot ( Inceste ) ou Catherine Millet ( La vie sexuelle de Catherine M. ) inscrivent le travail d’aurita dans une tradition feminine et feministe mais aussi scandaleuse. Cet article analyse le scandale mediatique autour d’aurita selon une perspective feministe contemporaine dans la culture populaire que nous appelons pop-feminisme. Buzz-moi , son quatrieme opus, confirme l’approche critique et feministe de l’auteure envers les medias, la BD et le champ artistique, ce qui contribue a la creation et diffusion d’un contre-discours au feminin sur la liberation sexuelle et textuelle des roles et des genres (identitaires et litteraires). The ‘buzz’ or stir caused in the media by the French comic Fraise et chocolat in 2006 raises issues about women in the French artistic field. The author aurelia aurita (which she signs with no capital letters) seems to accumulate crossed barriers in art : a woman, of Asian origin, writing an erotic comics. Many references to other ‘tell-it-all’ women writers such as Virginie Despentes ( Baise-moi ), Christine Angot ( L’Insceste ) or Catherine Millet ( La vie sexuelle de Catherine M. ), situate aurita’s work within a feminine, feminist and scandalous tradition. This article analyses the media scandal around aurita according to a contemporary feminist perspective within pop culture to which we will refer as popfeminism. Buzz-moi , her fourth comics, confirms feminist and critical stands towards the media, the comics world and the artistic field which contribute to the creation and diffusion of a counter-discourse in the feminine on sexual and textual liberation of roles and gender/genres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207