Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Legacy of Public Administration: Background and Review, E. Vigoda POLITICS AND POLICY ANALYSIS: PLAYERS AND INTERESTS IN THE GOVERNING PROCESS Economic Versus Social Values and Other Dilemmas in Policy Making, I. Sharkansky Toward More Democratic Governance: Modernizing the Administrative State in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, G.E. Caiden and N.J. Caiden Accountability in New Public Management: An Elusive Phenomenon? R. Schwartz Governing in a Market Era: Alternative Models of Governing, B.G. Peters The Quest for Collaboration: Toward a Comprehensive Strategy for Public Administration, E. Vigoda and E. Gilboa SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS: VALUES, ETHICS, AND INFORMATION REVOLUTION IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS The Meaning of Work for Public-Sector Versus Private-Sector Employees, R. Snir and I. Harpaz New Ethical Challenges Under the New Reform Movements in the Public Administration Sector, R. Amado Public Administration-The New Generation: Management in High-Information-Level Societies, L.K. Caldwell The Digitized Health Service: A Theoretical Framework for Public Administration, U.E. Gattiker and I.M. Giversen Can Competition Transform Public Organizations? European Attempts to Revitalize Hospitals Through Market Mechanisms, M.I. Harrison ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGERIAL ANALYSIS: A BUSINESS MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR Some Organizational Learning About Change: Effective and Timely Change Are Not Oxymoronic in the Public Sector, R.T. Golembiewski and C. Miller The Organization of Chaos: The Structure of Disaster Management, A. Kirschenbaum Consumer Communications Management and Public Administration: A View from the Business Bridge, M. Davidow Toward Comprehensive Reform of Israel's Education System, A. Globerson and R. Ben-Yshai SYNTHESIS AND SUMMARY: CURRENT TRENDS AND THE WAY FORWARD Public Management and Governance: Emerging Trends and Potential Future Directions, T. Bovaird Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.051 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.024 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".