Folding of the SAM-I riboswitch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riboswitches are ligand-dependent RNA genetic regulators that control gene expression by altering their structures. The elucidation of riboswitch conformational changes before and after ligand recognition is crucial to understand how riboswitches can achieve high ligand binding affinity and discrimination against cellular analogs. The detailed characterization of riboswitch folding pathways suggest that they may use their intrinsic conformational dynamics to sample a large array of structures, some of which being nearly identical to ligand-bound molecules. Some of these structural conformers can be "captured" upon ligand binding, which is crucial for the outcome of gene regulation. Recent studies about the SAM-I riboswitch have revealed unexpected and previously unknown RNA folding mechanisms. For instance, the observed helical twist of the P1 stem upon ligand binding to the SAM-I aptamer adds a new element in the repertoire of RNA strategies for recognition of small metabolites. From an RNA folding perspective, these findings also strongly indicate that the SAM-I riboswitch could achieve ligand recognition by using an optimized combination of conformational capture and induced-fit approaches, a feature that may be shared by other RNA regulatory sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".