The Internet as a Site of Citizenship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canada is a world leader in communications development and use and has been so since before its confederation as a state in 1867. Our prominence in this field is directly traceable to the challenges we have had to negotiate and must continue to negotiate in our development as a culture. • A combination of vast territory and small population dictates our need to negotiate culture across distance. • Geographical proximity to the most powerful nation in the world and one with which we share innumerable interests and similarities dictates our need to negotiate culture against erosion. • Cultural diversity, originating with two “founding” European nations imposed upon our resilient First Nations and nurtured by our history as an immigration destination of choice, dictates our need to negotiate culture within difference. Now home to a citizenry that can trace its origins to all corners of the globe, our nation has since 1982 enshrined our “multicultural heritage” in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. • An ethic and history of commitment to social justice dictates our necessity to negotiate our culture amongst issues of class, age, gender and differing abilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".