Seasonal and diurnal variations of PolarDARN <i>F</i> region echo occurrence in the polar cap and their causes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract F region echo occurrence rates for the Polar Dual Auroral Radar Network (PolarDARN) HF radars at Inuvik (INV), Rankin Inlet (RKN), and Clyde River (CLY) are compared for observations in 2013. The CLY radar shows somewhat smaller echo occurrence rates consistent with its more poleward geographic and geomagnetic location. For all three radars, the winter occurrence rates are roughly twice that of the corresponding summer rates. For observations in the midnight sector, strong equinoctial maxima are evident. In terms of season and local time, echo occurrence patterns are found to be roughly the same for all radars: seasonally, clear maxima are found near noon during both winter and summer, while, diurnally, enhancements are found during equinoctial dusk. A comparison of data from roughly the same scattering area shows that having strong electron density in the scattering volume is not sufficient for getting an HF echo: propagation conditions along the propagation path are also important. Diurnal variations in the F region electron density and electric field (both measured by Canadian Advanced Digital Ionosonde) are compared to those of RKN echo occurrence rates for observations over Resolute Bay (RB) located at a geomagnetic latitude of 83°N. These results show a reasonable correlation between occurrence and electron density for both winter and summer periods and correlation between occurrence and electric field during summer periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".