Shades of Xenophobia: In-Migrants and Immigrants in Mizamoyethu, Cape Town
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’hostilité des relations entre Africains du sud et immigrants africains est un fait ironique de la période post-apartheid. Mizamoyethu, établissement informel dans le quartier de Hout Bay, au Cap, n’est qu’un des nombreux centres à avoir connu la violence entre les “indigènes” et les “étrangers.” Après avoir souligné l’histoire, la géographie et la démographie de Mizamoyethu, ainsi qu’un compte-rendu du conflit, cet article identifie et explique les forces qui divisent la communauté. Le facteur le plus important s’est révélé être la concurrence pour les emplois, particulièrement dans l’industrie de la pêche locale. Dans le contexte d’une grande pauvreté matérielle et d’un chômage aux proportions inquiétantes, cette concurrence a alimenté la xénophobie et la violence qui en découlent. Les structures du conflit persisteront tant que ne changeront pas les circonstances matérielles, et toute tentative de résoudre le conflit restera, au mieux, un palliatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".