MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1531613298 · doi:10.1029/gm012p0081

Seismic Refraction Surveys in British Columbia, 1941-1966- a Preliminary Interpretation

2011· book-chapter· en· W1531613298 on OpenAlex
W. R. H. White, M. N. Bone, W G Milne

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical Observatory
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismic refractionCrustBouguer anomalyPlateau (mathematics)Mantle (geology)Oceanic crustSeismologyBasementGeophysicsTransition zoneGravity anomalySubductionTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismic refraction studies between 1964 and 1966 in the interior plateau and ranges of British Columbia are described. A reversed profile along the interior plateau from Quesnel to Merritt with an unreversed extension to the U.S. border has been interpreted in two ways. The preferred solution in terms of rms fit shows that the transition from subnormal to normal Pn velocity takes place north of Clinton. The mantle-crust boundary undulates several kilometers, and the crust is on the average 30 km thick. There is no evidence for an intermediate layer, and the upper basement velocity is uniform at 6.1 km/sec. Observations from the Ripple Rock explosion of 1958 and another profile southwest from Revelstoke are difficult to reconcile, since they require a rapid crustal thinning between Kamloops and Hope, B.C., where the inferred depth is only 28 km. A second solution suggests a uniform Pn velocity of 8.0 km/sec and crustal thinning toward the north in the interior plateau and to the west across the interior ranges and plateau. Crustal depths vary from 34 to 28 km in the area. The fit to the observations with this model is not quite so good, but observation parallel and perpendicular to the physiographic strike can be reconcile with gentler dips. Again no intermediate layer velocity can be determined. Neither seismic model fits a naïve interpretation of the gravity data available, and the magnetic variation results are insufficient to help distinguish between them. The uniformly thin crust and the negative Bouguer anomalies suggest that the upper mantle low velocity layer must be at shallow depth in central British Columbia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it