MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1532277835 · doi:10.20622/jltaj.7.0_110

A Logistic Regression for Differential Item Functioning Primer

2005· article· en· W1532277835 on OpenAlexaff
Yuko Shimizu, Bruno D. Zumbo

Bibliographic record

VenueJLTA Journal Kiyo · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionPrimer (cosmetics)Differential (mechanical device)PsychologyDifferential item functioningStatisticsClinical psychologyMathematicsItem response theoryEngineeringPsychometricsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to describe a statistical methodology, logistic regression (hereafter referred to as LogR), for differential item fimctioning (hereafter referred to as DIF) for language testing. We wi11 illustrate Logh DM with an English test used fbr a placement purpose with newly entered students in a private university in Japan, With an eye toward our purpose we wi11 first provide a basic overview; including the definition, purpose. and metheds ofDIF. Second, to contextualize LogR DIF methods for language testers, we review some studies using DIF analysis in the field of 1anguage testing, VVe close with a step-by-step guide and demonstration of using LogR DIF statistical methods using a sample data ofthe aforememioned English test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.320
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJLTA Journal KiyoSame topicMulti-Criteria Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207